From the Underwriting Desk

Mechanics5 min read

Debt Yield Sets Your Proceeds. Not LTV.

If a hotel’s cash flow supports $32.5M and 65% of appraised value asks for $35.75M, the smaller number is the loan amount. The value does not make the gap disappear.

We take broker calls every week on hotel refinances where the sponsor wants 65% of the appraised value. The requested leverage is rarely unusual. The cash flow often is.

Normalize the expenses and the in-place net operating income is what it is. The value-based request produces a loan amount that looks reasonable on the term-sheet cover page. The debt-yield calculation produces a smaller answer before anyone opens the leverage tab.

That is not a debate about which underwriting metric is more generous. They measure different things.

LTV starts with value: loan amount divided by property value. Debt yield starts with cash flow: net operating income divided by loan amount. LTV can be affected by sales comparables, a selected capitalization rate, and the value conclusion attached to a future business plan. Debt yield asks a blunter question: how much recurring cash flow is available for each dollar of debt on day one?

The answer matters more when a sponsor needs a bridge loan to get to a permanent takeout. A takeout lender will test income too. If the bridge only works at the appraisal number, the exit may be a hope rather than a structure.

The two answers

Use this simplified example. It is not a live deal.

Input Illustration
In-place stabilized NOI $3.25M
Appraised value $55.0M
Requested LTV 65.0%
Debt-yield requirement 10.0%

At 65% LTV, the requested loan is $35.75M: $55.0M multiplied by 65%.

At a 10.0% debt yield, the proceeds are $32.5M: $3.25M divided by 10%.

The difference is $3.25M. It is not a rounding issue.

Method Calculation Loan amount
LTV $55.0M × 65% $35.75M
Debt yield $3.25M ÷ 10% $32.50M
Proceeds gap $35.75M − $32.50M $3.25M

A sponsor can bridge that gap with new equity, a lower purchase price, a subordinate capital layer that actually fits the senior lender’s intercreditor rules, or a smaller scope. What does not work is labeling the $3.25M as “future NOI” without showing the renovation, the room disruption, the absorption period, and the cash source that carries the asset through each one.

This is where hotel underwriting gets specific. An asset may have a credible renovation plan, a fresh brand, and a market with improving RevPAR. CoStar and Tourism Economics reported year-to-date U.S. RevPAR through April up 4.0%, with a 2.8% full-year growth forecast (CoStar). That still does not let us lend today against income that needs several operating seasons to arrive. We give credit for a well-supported ramp in the sizing case only when the reserve, sponsor liquidity, and exit all cover the period before it arrives.

Why LTV still matters

Debt yield is not a replacement for LTV. We run both because the asset can fail either test.

LTV protects against collateral-value volatility. If the $55.0M value in the illustration falls 10%, the same $35.75M loan becomes roughly 72% LTV. That changes the lender’s loss protection even if the NOI has not moved. Debt yield protects against an income shortfall. If the NOI falls from $3.25M to $2.93M, a $32.5M loan moves from a 10.0% debt yield to roughly 9.0%. That changes the cash-flow cushion even if an appraisal still supports the value.

We therefore size a hotel file to the most restrictive of the relevant constraints: debt yield, debt-service coverage, LTV, cost, and a supportable exit. The constraint that binds is the one that sets proceeds.

This week the market supplied a useful reminder that improving headline credit performance does not erase that work. Trepp reported that overall CMBS delinquency fell 20 basis points to 7.35% in June, led by a 79-basis-point reduction in lodging delinquency. At the same time, special servicing rose 34 basis points to 11.20% (Trepp). Lodging cures are good news. A rising special-servicing balance is a reminder that individual files still need a clear path through the next problem.

The 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.44% on June 30 (CNBC). We do not need to predict its next move to know that proceeds should not depend on a more accommodating permanent-loan market than the one the sponsor can demonstrate today.

The underwriting adjustments

When debt yield produces the smaller answer, the next step is not an argument about the appraisal. It is a sources-and-uses exercise.

First, separate in-place NOI from pro forma NOI. We want the current trailing-12 statement, the most recent three months, payroll detail, franchise fees, property taxes, insurance, and every normalization item. If management says a block of expenses disappears after renovation, we need a contract, a schedule, and a date.

Second, show the ramp month by month. A property cannot earn full ADR while a material portion of the room base is under renovation. The model needs the rooms out of service, occupancy, ADR, variable expenses, fixed expenses, debt service, and reserve draw. A single annual growth percentage hides all of that.

Third, identify the equity check before the loan committee call. In the illustration, the $3.25M gap is not the whole check. The sponsor also needs closing costs, reserve funding, PIP or renovation capital, and liquidity after closing. We want the source of each dollar, not a line labeled “sponsor equity” with no account statement behind it.

Fourth, underwrite the exit to a new debt-yield and coverage test. A bridge loan does not become safer because its maturity date is later. It becomes safer only if the asset reaches a cash-flow level that supports the debt at a takeout lender’s terms. If that path requires zero delay, a perfect ADR ramp, and lower rates, we reduce the loan or decline the file.

What to send first

A broker can save a week by sending the documents that let us calculate both answers on the first pass: current operating statements, trailing-12 financials, STR or comparable market reports, appraisal if one exists, franchise and PIP information, sources and uses, debt schedule, and a detailed business plan.

Do not lead with “65% LTV requested.” Lead with NOI, the exact change planned, the cost, the timing, and the equity that supports it. We will calculate LTV. We will also tell you whether the income supports the requested proceeds.

The box this week

  • Loan size: $5M floor; $20M–$100M is our usual range
  • Asset focus: transitional hotels, resorts, and mixed-use hospitality
  • Leverage: up to 65% of cost on suitable transitional hospitality, sized to debt yield and coverage
  • Structure: interest-only bridge financing with reserve requirements matched to the operating plan
  • Timing: initial sizing after a complete operating package and sources-and-uses review

Send the file with the NOI bridge, not just the valuation. The first debt-yield calculation will tell us whether the requested proceeds are in the box.

Thompson-Dewitt Financial. Commercial real estate bridge and construction financing, $5M–$100M+, hospitality-focused. All terms indicative only and subject to underwriting, diligence, and credit approval. This material is for informational purposes and is not a commitment to lend.